As August is over
halfway over, the true blockbusters are finished, at least for the time being.
But there will be a release of yet another sequel, Sinister 2, as summer winds
down into the lighter months of fall. Before the film is released however, I felt
the need to revisit it’s predecessor, the horror film Sinister.
Nearly a decade
ago, writer Ellison Oswald (Ethan Hawke) wrote his best-selling true crime
novel Kentucky Blood. After all of these years, Oswald is desperate for a way
to duplicate this success, moving his family into a new home in which there was
a recent unsolved and gruesome murder. The discovery of a box of 8mm film in
his attic leads Ellison into a downward spiral, losing his mind slightly with
each passing day.
There are very few
horror films I even give the time of day as I often find them very un-scary and
overall clichéd to the highest extent. And while Sinister certainly has its
share of clichés, it’s able to get a pass by presenting them in an inventive
concept. For a genre as large as horror is, creating an inventive idea is
increasingly harder as each year passes, but Sinister takes a new spin on some
older ideas while sprinkling in a little of it’s own DNA.
Ethan Hawke is the
shining element of the film. The actor delivers
an astounding and purely convincing performance as the writer disturbed but
engrossed by the flickering horror before him. The performance is certainly
Hawke giving it his all and it pays off, making the stakes feel much more real
and in turn the horror that much more horrifying. While Hawke is
largely the only character on screen for most of the slightly long run time, he is offered
some support from Juliet Rylance, who plays his loving if not irritable wife
Tracy, and James Ranstone, playing a helpful Deputy who just so happens to be a
huge fan of Oswald.
Scott Derrickson,
the director, makes use of the horror conventions really well, and if you’re
vulnerable to them you’ll find the film creepy and unsettling for much of the
time. And while he improves on a less
than stellar script, the effects are still felt, as Derrickson can only do so
much with an iffy script. The overall dark state of the film keeps you largely
in the dark, both literally and metaphorically. Music and sound cues play a key
part, as they do in any horror film, to set up an atmosphere for the spooky
activities to occur.
Overall Sinister
is a solid horror film, but nowhere near being great. The film combines pretty
standard elements of horror but it’s not the combination of these clichés but rather the way they are executed to weave the story together. The film is slightly longer than it should be
and the script isn’t quite up to par, but Sinister manages to get passed these
issues and still bring us a very creepy atmosphere, thus making it a horror
film that accomplishes what it set out to do. (6.0/10)
No comments :
Post a Comment