Nineteen years removed from Unbreakable, a film
that’s largely felt underappreciated for much of its life, director and writer
M. Night Shyamalan returns to the world of superheroes once more with the long-awaited
sequel, Glass. While Split offered a different perspective into
this world, Glass brings back the characters that made Unbreakable the
interesting and suspenseful film that it was. And with Shyamalan’s talent
quietly shining through once more, the anticipation for Glass couldn’t
be higher, which makes it failures all the more hurtful.
Vigilante David Dunn (Bruce Willis) is in pursuit of Kevin
Wendell Crumb’s (James McAvoy) superhuman figure of The Beast in a series of
escalating encounters of these supposed super beings, while the shadowy
presence of Elijah Price (Samuel L. Jackson) emerges as an orchestrator who
holds secrets critical to both men and their abilities.
Without any reservations, James McAvoy is once again the
best piece of a Shyamalan film. Not unlike his turn in Split, McAvoy
vanishes into a portrayal of twenty-four distinct personalities, seamlessly
switching gears with ease. In many ways, he becomes the only interesting
character in this subdued super-powered sequel. His performance is worth the
price of admission, even if the rest of the film is a complete mess.
Unfortunately, the return of the two Unbreakable stars
is a complete waste, both for vastly different reasons. Samuel L. Jackson does
his best with the lackluster material, bringing the same over the top
mastermind qualities needed for the role in Unbreakable. However, his
limited presence for a majority of the narrative seems misguided for the
titular character. Jackson’s other half, Bruce Willis, is an entirely different
story. Willis appears to be sleepwalking through the film, not unlike most of
his recent work, and virtually disappears as a character around the halfway
point, serving mainly as the muscle for McAvoy’s Crumb to fight.
And yet, despite two of the film’s leading characters
feeling utterly wasted, the film still shows signs of potential. There are
moments and themes that, if explored properly, could’ve led to a really
exciting conclusion to this unusual trilogy. Instead, director and writer M.Night Shyamalan, infamous for twisty endings, goes in a different direction,
one that’s bound to leave many viewers with an overwhelming sense of
disappointment. It is undoubtedly a gutsy decision, one that maybe would’ve
worked in a better film, but here it just winds up being a baffling cap to a
unique franchise.
Glass is not an awful film, just disappointing.
Shyamalan has committed many a cinematic crime in the past, and yet this feels
like it could be the worst. Outside of another stellar performance from McAvoy,
nothing really connects the way it should. And while there are very brief
glimpses to the best Shyamalan can be, they crumble before fully materializing
and what’s left is a fairly broken narrative that never quite knows what it
wants to be.
No comments :
Post a Comment