Where one costume drama strives to be different and unique
in The Favourite, another aims for the typical and well-traveled path of
films that have come before. It isn’t that Mary Queen of Scots is bad by
any means, just safe, utilizing the usual tropes and beats that similar films
have come to follow. And yet its production design and costumes paired with
some talented leading women make it hard to write off entirely.
Queen of France at 16 and widowed at 18, Mary Stuart
(Saoirse Ronan) defies pressure to remarry. Instead, she returns to her native
Scotland to reclaim her rightful throne. But Scotland and England fall under
the rule of the compelling Elizabeth I (Margot Robbie). Each young Queen
beholds her sister in fear and fascination. Rivals in power and in love, and
female regents in a masculine world, the two must decide how to play the game
of marriage versus independence.
Two women, two queens. Both of these actresses are uniquely
talented individuals are worthy of filling the shoes of royalty, it’s only a
shame the script wasn’t slightly more giving to them both. For Saoirse Ronan,
the character of Mary never really takes hold. Her performance is good, rarely
does Ronan not deliver at minimum a good performance, but the interpretation
lacks charisma or immediacy and is far too progressive for a sixteenth century
monarch.
On the other hand, is Margot Robbie, who fares a bit better
in a different role than she is used to. The performance from Robbie showcases
her abilities as a character actor, a perfect counterpart to the more likable
lead and morally damaged individual. Director Josie Rourke uses Elizabeth
sparingly, and it allows the majesty of Mary to shine through even brighter.
If nothing else, the design and look of the film is elegant
as could be. The score from Max Richter is one of the year’s best, despite
being left of the Oscar shortlist for Best Original Score, and the costumes
from Alexandra Byrne, who has experience in the Elizabethan Age department, are
downright gorgeous. Mary Queen of Scots is a beautifully made movie, a
treat for the eyes even when the narrative elements may slip up.
Where the film falters in its exceptionally poor pacing, a
potential side effect from a first-time director in Josie Rourke. The first
half of the film is committed to the rather non-cinematic details of the
various rules of succession. While it is undoubtedly needed to some degree for
understanding the dynamic between Elizabeth and Mary, it runs the risk of
alienating those members of the audience who find the inner-workings of royalty
taxing. And unfortunately, Mary Queen of Scots does immense damage to
its narrative by doing just that, getting caught in the minutia of it all
before finally reaching the far more cinematic and interesting moments of the
back half.
Mary Queen of Scots is not the most adventurous or
daring historical costume drama in recent memory, but there’s enough there for
those interested in these figures to gain their interest. If royal politics and
succession are not your area of interest however, the film may leave you
wanting more beyond the beautiful technical elements and the solid lead
performances. There are too many problems with the narrative and the pacing to
call this a complete success, but there are worse ways to spend a few hours of
the day and it feels like a decent foundation for director Josie Rourke’s
budding career.
No comments :
Post a Comment